Share to:
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
By Adam M. Carlson
Managing Partner

When a defective product causes a fatal injury, California law allows certain surviving family members to bring a wrongful death claim against the parties responsible. These cases often arise from unsafe designs, manufacturing flaws, or missing warnings, and they are especially common with products made for children.

Defective product wrongful death claims combine California’s wrongful death statute with strict product liability rules. That combination creates powerful legal tools, but it also raises complex issues that differ from other fatal accident cases.

How California’s Wrongful Death Law Applies to Defective Products

California’s wrongful death statute allows surviving family members to seek compensation when a death is caused by another party’s wrongful act or neglect. In product cases, that wrongful act may involve:

  • A dangerous design that made the product unsafe from the start
  • A manufacturing defect that caused a specific item to fail
  • Inadequate warnings or instructions about known risks

Unlike negligence-only cases, product liability claims do not always require proof that the manufacturer acted carelessly. If a product was defective and that defect caused the death, liability may attach even without showing intent or recklessness.

Who Can Bring a Wrongful Death Claim in a Product Case?

California law limits who may file a wrongful death lawsuit. In defective product cases, eligible claimants typically include:

  • A surviving spouse or registered domestic partner
  • Children of the deceased
  • Grandchildren, if the deceased’s children are also deceased
  • Other dependents or heirs, in certain circumstances

When the victim is a child, the parents usually have standing to bring the claim. These cases often involve consumer products, toys, cribs, car seats, or other items that should never pose a fatal risk during normal use.

Damages Available in Defective Product Wrongful Death Claims

Wrongful death damages focus on the losses suffered by surviving family members, not the harm to the person who died. In defective product cases, recoverable damages may include:

  • Funeral and burial expenses
  • Loss of financial support the deceased would have provided
  • Loss of companionship, care, and guidance
  • Loss of household services

Punitive damages are not available in a standard wrongful death claim. However, related survival actions may allow recovery of additional damages tied to the decedent’s own suffering before death, depending on the facts.

The Heightened Duty on Manufacturers, Especially for Child Products

Manufacturers have a legal duty to design and produce products that are reasonably safe. That duty is heightened when a product is intended for children or is likely to cause severe injury or death if it fails.

Products marketed for infants and children must account for foreseeable misuse, developmental limitations, and the reality that children cannot assess risk. If a safer alternative design existed, or if known hazards were ignored, liability exposure increases significantly.

We often see this issue in cases involving choking hazards, tip-over risks, suffocation dangers, and electrical or mechanical failures in child products.

Product Recalls and Their Role in Wrongful Death Cases

A product recall does not automatically establish liability, but it can play an important role in a wrongful death case. Recalls may show that:

  • The manufacturer knew or should have known about the defect
  • The risk of serious injury or death was foreseeable
  • Warnings or corrective actions came too late

Even if a recall was issued after the fatal incident, it can still support claims that the product was unreasonably dangerous when sold.

How Defective Product Wrongful Death Cases Differ From Other Fatal Claims

Defective product cases differ from car accidents or premises liability claims in several key ways:

  • Liability may extend beyond one individual to manufacturers, distributors, and retailers
  • Proof often relies on engineering analysis, testing data, and product history
  • Strict liability standards may apply, reducing the need to prove negligence
  • Corporate conduct and internal safety decisions are often central issues

These cases can involve multiple defendants and significant resources, which makes early investigation and preservation of evidence especially important.

Taking the Next Step After a Product-Related Death

Losing a loved one to a dangerous product raises painful questions about accountability and prevention. When you are facing that reality, understanding your legal options matters.

At Casper, Meadows, Schwartz & Cook, we work with families to evaluate defective product wrongful death claims and pursue answers with care and resolve. If you are considering legal action after a product-related death, contact us to talk with you about what comes next and how we can help.

About the Author
Attorney Adam M. Carlson is managing partner at Casper, Meadows, Schwartz & Cook. While he is skilled in various areas of law, he focuses the majority of his practice on serious injury cases, wrongful death and civil rights.